- From: Dominik George <nik@naturalnet.de>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 17:22:37 +0200
- To: public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org
Received on Monday, 14 April 2025 15:22:43 UTC
Hi, while considering the compatibility between RDF 1.1 and 1.2 software, I came across the notion of RDF profiles defined in [1]. I am wondering how applications should treat the ambiguity of the media types of the standard RDF serialisations, especially when doing HTTP content negotiation: If a server software emitting RDF data is asked for such data, it would be helpful to know whether the client can handle RDF 1.2 or not. If a client, by specifying a header like "Accept: text/turtle; profile=basic", declares that it doesn't support triple terms, but the graph data I am to server is known to contain triple terms, my server could reply with 406 Not Acceptable instead of generating triple data that the client won't be able to understand anyway. Cheers, Nik [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf12-concepts/#conformance
Received on Monday, 14 April 2025 15:22:43 UTC