- From: Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 08:31:03 +0000
- To: "ddooss@wp.pl" <ddooss@wp.pl>
- CC: "public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 10 October 2024 08:31:12 UTC
Hi Dominik, the discussion in the Semantics TF is not about defining a specific Turtle syntactic shortcut, but rather about which behaviour and impact rdfs:states should have at different levels of RDF: in simple semantics, in RDF semantics, in SPARQL, and how it could be differentiated from rdf:reifies in Turtle (since the Turtle shortcut for reification hides the rdf:reifies property). It seems to me that this is appropriate for the TF, but the group may decide otherwise. cheers —e. On 9 Oct 2024, at 20:04, ddooss@wp.pl wrote: Hi Enrico, I wasn't aware that the Semantic Task Force was involved with Turtle syntax. This seems somewhat unexpected to me, as I assumed the focus was more on semantics rather than specific syntactic shortcuts. Could you clarify if the group is shifting its attention towards this area? If so, I think it's time to rename the group 🙂 Best regards, Dominik Dnia 09 października 2024 19:12 Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it> napisał(a): Hi, I can not be at the semantics meeting on Friday. I am not sure whether there is interest in continuing the discussion on rdfs:states and its possible Turtle shortcut, or in something else. —e.
Received on Thursday, 10 October 2024 08:31:12 UTC