- From: James Anderson <anderson.james.1955@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 16:10:15 +0100
- To: RDF-star Working Group <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
yesterday, during the discussion on this topic it was argued that, because "the standard should reflect the reality", this requirement should be made optional. are there any statistics available which account for this reality? - how many rdf processors accept and store ill-typed literals - of those which accept, how many store literal terms uniformly, that is, with no distinguished representation for known datatypes - of those which accept, how many distinguish known datatypes, yet still incorporate ill-typed literals in constructed graphs - how many reject ill-typed literals - of those which reject, how many, because it would "produce a semantic inconsistency" - of those which reject, how many, because it would complicate processing an optimized term representation - how many rdf processors do not reject ill-typed literals, but do exclude them from constructed graphs? --- james anderson | james@dydra.com | https://dydra.com
Received on Friday, 15 November 2024 15:10:32 UTC