- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:51:59 +0100
- To: public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org
On 18/06/2024 08:52, Franconi Enrico wrote:
> On 17 Jun 2024, at 21:04, Peterson, Eric L. [US-US]
> <Eric.L.Peterson@leidos.com> wrote:
>> Would I be justified in being very disappointed in a spec that didn't
>> allow me to name triple terms?
>>
>> For simplicity below, I didn't model this example the way I would at
>> work. But look at all the notational duplication. Can we have a spec
>> that allows that naming of triple terms and the subsequent referencing
>> of the name in place of a triple term?
>>
>> I'm very new to RDF-star/SPARQL-star. Please forgive me if I've
>> missed some way around this issue.
>>
>> <<_:Person__1 ex :hasPhoneNumber _:11111111111>> pr:clearance
>> _:UNCLASSIFIED .
>> <<_:Person__1 ex :hasPhoneNumber _:11111111111>> pr:source _:DHS .
>> <<_:Person__1 ex :hasPhoneNumber _:11111111111>> pr:likelihood 0.8
>> <<_:Person__1 ex :hasPhoneNumber _:11111111111>> pr:dataSet
>> _:someDataSet .
>> <<_:Person__1 ex :hasPhoneNumber _:11111111111>> pr:sourceRecord
>> _:PERSON .
>> <<_:Person__1 ex :hasPhoneNumber _:11111111111>> pr:sourceRecordID 329 .
>
> According to the current proposal, you could write in Turtle concrete
> syntax:
>
> <<_:b | _:Person__1 ex :hasPhoneNumber _:11111111111>> pr:clearance
> _:UNCLASSIFIED .
> _:b pr:source _:DHS .
> _:b pr:likelihood 0.8
> _:b pr:dataSet _:someDataSet .
> _:b pr:sourceRecord _:PERSON .
> _:b pr:sourceRecordID 329 .
>
> Note, though, that you are not naming the triple term, but one of the
> reifications of the triple term.
The WG has also been using, informally, "occurrence" or "usage" for the
reifications of a single triple term.
Andy
>
> —e.
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2024 16:52:05 UTC