- From: Peterson, Eric L. [US-US] <Eric.L.Peterson@leidos.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:26:12 +0000
- To: "public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <PH2P110MB0857CB4A7892193181F28717D8CDA@PH2P110MB0857.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
I have been naming my triples for many years. I just use the fourth member of the quad for the triple name (URI): [cid:df79a4e1-e667-4995-b138-6d22e993d233] ________________________________ From: Peterson, Eric L. [US-US] <Eric.L.Peterson@leidos.com> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2024 3:04 PM To: public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org> Subject: Naming triples Hi folks; Thanks for working on getting us something better than triple reification for edge metadata! Would I be justified in being very disappointed in a spec that didn't allow me to name triple terms? For simplicity below, I didn't model this example the way I would at work. But look at all the notational duplication. Can we have a spec that allows that naming of triple terms and the subsequent referencing of the name in place of a triple term? I'm very new to RDF-star/SPARQL-star. Please forgive me if I've missed some way around this issue. <<_:Person__1 ex :hasPhoneNumber _:11111111111>> pr:clearance _:UNCLASSIFIED . <<_:Person__1 ex :hasPhoneNumber _:11111111111>> pr:source _:DHS . <<_:Person__1 ex :hasPhoneNumber _:11111111111>> pr:likelihood 0.8 <<_:Person__1 ex :hasPhoneNumber _:11111111111>> pr:dataSet _:someDataSet . <<_:Person__1 ex :hasPhoneNumber _:11111111111>> pr:sourceRecord _:PERSON . <<_:Person__1 ex :hasPhoneNumber _:11111111111>> pr:sourceRecordID 329 . Thanks! -Eric
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image.png
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2024 06:46:00 UTC