- From: Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 12:20:30 +0000
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
> On 14 Jun 2024, at 16:55, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: > > Because in RDF and RDFS there is little difference between opaque and non-opaque triple terms why are they present? Is there any use case using RDF or RDFS that depends on the difference? Storing a triple with :John is different from storing a triple with :Jake, would be an example. The Superman and Clark Kent example, to mention another one. Observe that I am not necessarily keen on having opaque triple terms in rdf-star. I am just observing that there are examples coming from annotations of syntactic triples, and examples of modal contexts with non-rigid designators. —e.
Received on Sunday, 16 June 2024 12:20:36 UTC