- From: Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 13:28:27 +0000
- To: Thomas Lörtsch <tl@rat.io>
- CC: "public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>, RDF-star Working Group <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
Trivial change. > On 14 Jun 2024, at 15:27, Thomas Lörtsch <tl@rat.io> wrote: > > Hi Enrico, > > thank you for the new proposal! Just one slightly tangential question: what would need to change to make triple terms (no matter if transparent or opaque) readily asserted? > > Best > Thomas > > Am 14. Juni 2024 14:20:45 MESZ schrieb Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it>: >> Hi, >> after the discussions last week arguing the non-intuitiveness of fully opaque triple terms as literals, and after the comments that opaque tripe terms should have transparent bnodes, I have prepared a new version of the baseline document, where opaque triple terms have opaque IRIs and transparent bnodes: >> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/wiki/RDF-star-"baseline-with-IRI-opacity”<https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/wiki/RDF-star-"baseline-with-IRI-opacity"> >> Note that annotations are not anymore functional with opaque triple terms anymore, since it would make little sense with transparent bnodes in opaque triple terms. Still, as I already discussed privately with some of you, even without functionality we should still be able to capture the LPG use cases. >> See you later, >> —e.
Received on Friday, 14 June 2024 13:28:33 UTC