- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 13:32:48 -0400
- To: RDF-star Working Group <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
My stance on rdf:JSON is that if rdf:JSON is included in the RDF
recommendations then it should be JSON - with all the syntactical warts. So
valid rdf:JSON literals should include all of:
"{\"a\": 1, \"a\": 2}"^^rdf:JSON
"1e1000"^^rdf:JSON
"\\uDEAD"^^rdf:JSON
Each of these three literals provide problems for the value space and the
lexical-to-value mapping. I would prefer an expansive value space but this is
not what is specified in JSON-LD 1.1 so I can live with a more-constrained
value space so long as the lexical space is not reduced.
peter
Received on Thursday, 2 November 2023 17:32:55 UTC