- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 16:34:57 +0100
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org
On 19/05/2023 16:23, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
>> On May 19, 2023, at 8:16 AM, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote:
>> A fix:
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-schema/pull/21
>>
>> sets the prevRecURI and then the "Latest Recommendation" is set to something that works.
>>
>> SPARQL docs use prevRecURI.
>>
>> (They could be updated to use prevRecShortname now. Does this matter?)
>
> It doesn’t seem so; from the docs, if `prevRecURI` is not specified, the reference is taken from `prevRecShortname`.
They are all there - two are wrong (or jumping ahead to the new 1.1. naming)
1.1 era short names:
sparql11-http-rdf-update
rdf-sparql-XMLres
Presumably short names don't go away, only new ones which are in addition.
> I suggest that we have in place the links for rdf10-, sparql10-, rdf11-, sparql11 as alternatives. We may or may not actually use these when referencing shortnames.
+1
Are these link short names ones that the WG needs a resolution about?
IIRC short names are formally chosen. Or are these link forms "lesser"
and don't need that?
Andy
>
> Gregg
Received on Friday, 19 May 2023 15:35:05 UTC