W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > June 2017

Re: Service or repository of SHACL rules available? (like LOV or prefix.cc)

From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 06:05:39 +0100
To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
Message-ID: <de5d2551-92ce-14b2-280a-ad951ef02762@w3.org>
I suggest that the SHACL CG [1] might be the place to discuss and pursue 
this very good idea. The collection would probably be curated in a 
GitHub repo overseen by that group?


[1] https://www.w3.org/community/shacl/

On 28/06/2017 23:38, Holger Knublauch wrote:
> Hi Konrad,
> I am not aware of such a service. It would be a great starting point.
> SHACL will have a bit of a chicken-and-egg problem, as it needs a
> certain level of adoption before more people will invest into it. Any
> collections of SHACL files will help.
> And of course the SHACL files themselves, first. For example, I recently
> created a quick version of the RDF Data Cube vocabulary's constraints,
> which ended up at
>     https://www.w3.org/2011/gld/validator/
> (and BTW would benefit from a proper "owner"). A service where people
> could register their SHACL files would be awesome.
> Holger
> On 27/06/2017 21:35, Konrad Abicht wrote:
>> Hello,
>> does anyone know a service (e.g. LOV or prefix.cc) or repository (e.g.
>> on Github) which provides SHACL rules, grouped by target classes?
>> I would like to search rules by target class, for instance,
>> foaf:Person. After getting a list, i would like to download certain
>> ones and use them locally. Versioning or collaboration tools would be
>> great too, so that the community may contribute to SHACL rules.
>> Thanks in advance!


Phil Archer
Data Strategist, W3C

+44 (0)7887 767755
Received on Thursday, 29 June 2017 05:05:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:50 UTC