- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 06:05:39 +0100
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
I suggest that the SHACL CG [1] might be the place to discuss and pursue this very good idea. The collection would probably be curated in a GitHub repo overseen by that group? Phil [1] https://www.w3.org/community/shacl/ On 28/06/2017 23:38, Holger Knublauch wrote: > Hi Konrad, > > I am not aware of such a service. It would be a great starting point. > SHACL will have a bit of a chicken-and-egg problem, as it needs a > certain level of adoption before more people will invest into it. Any > collections of SHACL files will help. > > And of course the SHACL files themselves, first. For example, I recently > created a quick version of the RDF Data Cube vocabulary's constraints, > which ended up at > > https://www.w3.org/2011/gld/validator/ > > (and BTW would benefit from a proper "owner"). A service where people > could register their SHACL files would be awesome. > > Holger > > > On 27/06/2017 21:35, Konrad Abicht wrote: >> Hello, >> >> does anyone know a service (e.g. LOV or prefix.cc) or repository (e.g. >> on Github) which provides SHACL rules, grouped by target classes? >> >> I would like to search rules by target class, for instance, >> foaf:Person. After getting a list, i would like to download certain >> ones and use them locally. Versioning or collaboration tools would be >> great too, so that the community may contribute to SHACL rules. >> >> Thanks in advance! >> > > -- Phil Archer Data Strategist, W3C http://www.w3.org/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 29 June 2017 05:05:53 UTC