Re: SHACL for SHACL

• From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
• Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 18:45:01 +1000
• To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
• Message-ID: <88611a14-e252-c413-0898-307fe2e48a3f@topquadrant.com>

Thanks, good catch. Fixed.

Holger


On 3/04/2017 18:34, Olivier Corby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 04/03/2017 04:13 AM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>> ACTION: Everyone please review the SHACL file above, and/or try it 
>> against shape definitions - we should sign this off in the Wednesday 
>> meeting so that we can swiftly resubmit the CR request. 
>
>
> I think there is a problem with the URIs shsh:PropertyShape and 
> shsh:PropertyShapeShape, they should be the same URI :
>
>
> sh:property [
>         sh:path sh:property ;
>         sh:node shsh:PropertyShape ;    # property-node
>     ] ;
>
>
>
> shsh:PropertyShapeShape
>     a sh:NodeShape ;
>     sh:targetSubjectsOf sh:path ;
>     sh:node shsh:ShapeShape ;
>     sh:property [
>         sh:path sh:path ;
>         sh:maxCount 1 ;                 # path-maxCount
>         sh:minCount 1 ;                 # PropertyShape-path-minCount
>         sh:node shsh:PathShape ;        # path-node
>     ] ;
>
>
> The same problem occurs with shsh:NodeShapeShape and shsh:NodeShape
>
>
>
> Olivier
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Monday, 3 April 2017 08:45:44 UTC