Re: SHACL for SHACL

• From: Olivier Corby <olivier.corby@inria.fr>
• Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 10:34:58 +0200
• To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
• Message-ID: <58E20932.8080902@inria.fr>

Hi,

On 04/03/2017 04:13 AM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
> ACTION: Everyone please review the SHACL file above, and/or try it 
> against shape definitions - we should sign this off in the Wednesday 
> meeting so that we can swiftly resubmit the CR request. 


I think there is a problem with the URIs shsh:PropertyShape and 
shsh:PropertyShapeShape, they should be the same URI :


sh:property [
         sh:path sh:property ;
         sh:node shsh:PropertyShape ;    # property-node
     ] ;



shsh:PropertyShapeShape
     a sh:NodeShape ;
     sh:targetSubjectsOf sh:path ;
     sh:node shsh:ShapeShape ;
     sh:property [
         sh:path sh:path ;
         sh:maxCount 1 ;                 # path-maxCount
         sh:minCount 1 ;                 # PropertyShape-path-minCount
         sh:node shsh:PathShape ;        # path-node
     ] ;


The same problem occurs with shsh:NodeShapeShape and shsh:NodeShape



Olivier

Received on Monday, 3 April 2017 08:35:33 UTC