- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:47:06 -0700
- To: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>, "public-rdf-sha." <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
As far as I can tell there is no longer a problem with constrain. However, I'm not the originator of the issue so I'm not the one who should be contacted to see if the problem is satisfactorily resolved. peter On 09/28/2016 08:00 PM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote: > You're are correct that it was based on incorrect information. Dimitris is > saying it is now resolved. Could you please tell us whether you disagree with > that? > > Thank you. > -- > Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - IBM Cloud > > > > > From: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com> > To: Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>, Karen > Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> > Cc: "public-rdf-sha." <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org> > Date: 09/28/2016 05:51 PM > Subject: Re: on the closing of ISSUE-163 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > So ISSUE-163 was closed based on incorrect information then. > > ISSUE-163 was opened in response to an external comment, as shown in the issue > record at https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/163 > > The working group should present the commenter with a clear indication that > the issue has been cleanly closed. This would require re-opening the issue in > light of its first closure being based on incorrect information. Given that > the issue was incorrectly closed a second closure should involve a different > working group member examining the SHACL document to see whether all remaining > uses of variations of "constrain" are appropriate. When the issue cleanly > closed the working group should send a message to the commenter stating that > it has closed an issue based on his comments and asking whether he is > satisfied with the resolution of the issue. > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider > Nuance Communications > > > On 09/28/2016 07:10 AM, Dimitris Kontokostas wrote: >> Hi Peter, Karen, >> I already eliminated all these occurrences >> https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commits/gh-pages >> >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net >> <mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net>> wrote: >> >> Peter, I did miss the "constrains" in the property pair section, so I will >> try to come up with a different wording for that and will propose it. The >> usage in 4.7.2 is, IMO, in accordance with English language usage, and I >> think is appropriate here. >> >> kc >> >> >> On 9/27/16 9:16 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >> >> >From Section 4.6.1 of Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) W3C >> Editor's Draft 27 >> >> September 2016 at http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl >> <http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl> >> >> "sh:equals constrains a pair of properties so that the sets of values >> of both >> properties at a given focus node must be equal." >> >> This contradicts the claim in >> > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2016Sep/0046.html >> > <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2016Sep/0046.html> >> that ``constraint is still used, but no more "constrain" or >> "constraining". So >> it's a thing, but not a verb.'' >> >> There is a total of six uses of "constrains" in the document. >> >> >> The working group appears to have closed ISSUE-163 based on incorrect >> information. >> >> >> Peter F. Patel-Schneider >> Nuance Communications >> >> >> >> -- >> Karen Coyle >> kcoyle@kcoyle.net <mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net> http://kcoyle.net > <http://kcoyle.net/> >> m: 1-510-435-8234 >> skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600 <tel:%2B1-510-984-3600> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Dimitris Kontokostas >> Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig & DBpedia Association >> Projects: http://dbpedia.org <http://dbpedia.org/>, http://rdfunit.aksw.org > <http://rdfunit.aksw.org/>, http://aligned-project.eu <http://aligned-project.eu/> >> Homepage: http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas >> Research Group: AKSW/KILT http://aksw.org/Groups/KILT >> > > > >
Received on Monday, 3 October 2016 20:47:41 UTC