- From: james anderson <james@dydra.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 07:12:52 +0000
- To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
good morning; the term “in-scope” appears frequently in the current draft[1] where its definition and usage run contrary to the meaning which is customarily associated with the word[2]. if your intent is to produce a document which is accessible and readily understood, if the term itself is intended to characterize a triple, rather than the relation between a name and lexical entity, and its usage involves computing the subset of a graph, why do you not use a term which better connotes that that meaning? best regards, from berlin, — [1] : http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160530/ [2] : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scope_(computer_science) --- james anderson | james@dydra.com | http://dydra.com
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2016 07:13:26 UTC