Re: Where to place SHACL in the Semantic Web Stack?

Jose,

SHACL mainly depends on RDF. It will contain a language binding to
allow user-defined constraints written in SPARQL. I'd therefore draw
as sitting on the RDF box and include a "handle" that extends over the
SPARQL box (giving SHACL box a shape similar to the RDF box).

-- Arthur

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Jose María Alvarez Rodríguez
<chema.ar@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all:
>
> I am following the activity of the working group because I am very
> interested in the outcomes of this effort due to my on-going work with OSLC,
>
> As the subject of this mail introduces, I was wondering where to place SHACL
> in the Semantic Web Stack (taking as a reference [1]) for an internal
> tutorial I am gonna give,
>
> I guess it is just on top of RDF but since it could take parts of SPARQL,
> etc. Which would be in your opinion the best position? (if it makes sense to
> place SHACL in the stack)
>
> Thank you in advance!
>
> Best regards,
>
> [1] http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Semantic_Web_Stack.png
>
> --
> Jose María Alvarez Rodríguez
> WWW: www.josemalvarez.es
> Skype: josem.alvarez
>