- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:57:59 -0800
- To: Michel Dumontier <michel.dumontier@gmail.com>, "public-rdf-shapes@w3.org" <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There has been a lot of discussion on just what selectors to allow. :-) More seriously, both SPIN and OWL Constraints have a lot of flexibility in selection. Your example is a good demonstration that flexible selection is desirable. Maybe you should turn flexible selection into a requirement. SPIN gets flexible selection via global constraints - if you can write a SPARQL query that returns violations you have already implemented the constraint in SPIN. Your example can be quite easily turned into a SPARQL query so it can be handled by SPIN. OWL Constraints uses OWL axioms as constraints, interpreting them in the Herbrand model of an RDF graph under the RDFS semantics, so you get whatever flexibility OWL gives you. Your example can be quite easily turned into an OWL Constraints constraint. The selection mechanisms in Resource Shape are quite different, as far as I can tell. Maybe someone who understands Resource Shape can determine whether it can handle your example. ShExC doesn't define any selection mechanism. It is concerned with the determination of when a node in an RDF graph matches a shape. RDFUnit is roughly the combination of several of the above. peter On 02/11/2015 04:31 PM, Michel Dumontier wrote: > Hi, I've been trying to follow the vast number of correspondence in this > mailing list with minimal success, but I wanted to at least express how I > see myself using shapes. I imagined that I would first select the data of > interest, and secondly, check whether my constraints are violated. In > the example below, I use my own syntax to select those instances of > foaf:Person that have a homepage and check whether they have exactly 1 > foaf:mbox asserted. > > :myShape :select [ rdf:type foaf:Person; foaf:homepage xsd:anyURI . ]; > :constraint [ :property foaf:mbox; :value xsd:anyURI; :exactly 1 ] . > > to what degree have you discussed having such flexibility on the > selector? > > m. > > > Michel Dumontier Associate Professor of Medicine (Biomedical > Informatics), Stanford University Chair, W3C Semantic Web for Health Care > and the Life Sciences Interest Group http://dumontierlab.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU2/qXAAoJECjN6+QThfjzQREH/RlcTJ6jqzspDAr32r/sbuv1 v1Gln3/rzVPBYiJ/mDgDzs/xorvPAnnpHFSiD3ya/aU9xqn5Ax8lDRS4IUG3wrs5 zN+KorwvThaFn+JxAUnp9gcva3C+0ijGcZkdrm5UQBSkbhFq3ja9vOpPsqXjY9II TJ2gIhv0ugABvRYhtJpKJm+reaZpDmEL8/1/aAeFeB4oOZLeeHZGJA+ihppatjTO bkG8XVdR3mmcS5KsXnHCGIZJe69FTPrWjXZdexax7Ro8Slz390+jT10g0mLADXzR CTRYK/KwFGnl8oyJewdxE0niX8jDECp94FSGf8t+gEPLhawkTn+JAsIWg9ASmGI= =19OT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2015 00:58:32 UTC