- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 11:56:19 -0800
- To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org, "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
I think it would be best to say as little as possible, but to be clear. so this: It should be possible to provide a default value for a given property, e.g. so that input forms can be pre-populated and to insert a required property that is missing in a web service call. is good although I would change "and" to "or" -- basically because how it is used is optional, so using it for forms doesn't mean you also HAVE to use it for a web service call. "It should be possible to provide a default value for a given property, e.g. so that input forms can be pre-populated or to insert a required property that is missing in a web service call." (Also note that this conversation has taken place on the shapes rather than shapes-wg list, and everything else seems to be on the -wg list, so I've copied it here. That might be why others aren't responding.) kc On 2/6/15 6:52 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >>>> ==== Property Default Value ==== >>>> >>> >>>> >>>-It should be possible to provide a default value for a given >>>> >>>property, e.g. so that input forms can be pre-populated and to insert >>>> >>>a required property that is missing in a web service call. This >>>> >>>requirement is not about using default values as "inferred" triples >>>> >>>at run-time. +It should be possible to provide a default value for a >>>> >>>given property, e.g. so that input forms can be pre-populated and to >>>> >>>insert a required property that is missing in a web service call. >>> >> >>> >>The qualification may have been put in as an attempt to clarify the >>> >>meaning of this requirement. I don't think that the clarification is >>> >>necessary, but some might. >> > >> >Do you have some sense of what that clarification meant? Does it, e.g. >> >prohibit a processor from adding the default triples? > I'm not a proponent of this requirement. Someone who is in favour of it > should be figuring out whether the change is acceptable. > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Friday, 6 February 2015 19:56:47 UTC