Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints


On 8/11/15 4:31 AM, Simon Spero wrote:
> [resend to include list]
> On Aug 10, 2015 4:48 AM, "Phil Archer" < 
> <>> wrote:
> >
> > It's true that concept schemes, and RDF in general, are produced 
> inconsistently. The concept scheme at
> >, 
> for example, does include skos:inScheme links but there's no guarantee 
> that such properties will be included.
> If the property isn't there, and you are using closed world semantics, 
> then the skos:Concept is not in the skos:ConceptScheme, just like an 
> instance is not a member of class if it is not entailed before the 
> world is closed.
> > This use case is trivial to express in one line of *readable* OWL,

SHACL *can* be combined with OWL, RDFS or other types of inferencing as 
long as they produce RDF triples. I don't understand what you are trying 
to say.


Received on Monday, 10 August 2015 23:07:11 UTC