Simon, On 8/11/15 4:31 AM, Simon Spero wrote: > > [resend to include list] > > On Aug 10, 2015 4:48 AM, "Phil Archer" <phila@w3.org > <mailto:phila@w3.org>> wrote: > > > > It's true that concept schemes, and RDF in general, are produced > inconsistently. The concept scheme at > > http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/codelist/AdministrativeHierarchyLevel/, > for example, does include skos:inScheme links but there's no guarantee > that such properties will be included. > > If the property isn't there, and you are using closed world semantics, > then the skos:Concept is not in the skos:ConceptScheme, just like an > instance is not a member of class if it is not entailed before the > world is closed. > > > This use case is trivial to express in one line of *readable* OWL, > SHACL *can* be combined with OWL, RDFS or other types of inferencing as long as they produce RDF triples. I don't understand what you are trying to say. HolgerReceived on Monday, 10 August 2015 23:07:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:42 UTC