W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > April 2015

Re: ShEx questionnaire (was Re: RDF validation questionnaire)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:56:21 -0700
Message-ID: <552EB455.3070001@gmail.com>
To: kcoyle@kcoyle.net, public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The questionnaire is about ShEx, I agree.  The message that went out (see
below) talks about RDF validation without directly tying that to ShEx.

The situation is unfortunate in two ways:
1/ People who fill in the questionnaire may be confused as to what is being
asked about.
2/ An opportunity has been lost to get input about RDF validation that is
not tied to ShEx.

peter


On 04/15/2015 11:45 AM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> I read Eric's mail as not being about SHACL at all, but about work being
> done elsewhere that members of this group might inform. His note was also
> posted to the DCMI list that is discussing application profiles, which
> overlaps with this W3C group but is not the same. A questionnaire for
> SHACL has not be proposed, AFAIK.
> 
> kc
> 
> On 4/15/15 11:30 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: I am rather
> disappointed that the questionnaire is so tied to ShEx, particularly
> considering the subject of the email that went out.
> 
> As far as I am concerned the only information that the working group will
> be able to take away from the questionnaire is what people think should
> be included in ShEx.  This may have very little to do with what should
> be included in SHACL.
> 
> peter
> 
> 
> 
> On 04/15/2015 10:09 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>>>> In some Mayo grant work, I have prepared a questionnaire on the 
>>>> expressivity of shape expressions. It presents a high-level
>>>> language for expressing RDF constraints, explains a number of the
>>>> technical points, and asks the user for which features and
>>>> technical approaches are important to their work and their view of
>>>> what will make the language successful. There are a couple places
>>>> where you can click for extra geekiness, in case the baseline
>>>> geekiness was insufficient.
>>>> 
>>>> I'd like people to fill out the form imagining their immediate uses
>>>> for RDF validation as well as those that may come with new markets
>>>> enabled by the existence of such RDF validating tooling. The form
>>>> will record your results whenever you hit submit so you can easily
>>>> revisit your answers after reflection.
>>>> 
>>>> This work is supported in part by a NIH U01 grant – caCDE-QA 
>>>> (1U01CA180940-01A1).
>>>> 
>>>> On the top of my game here... here's the link: 
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2015/ShExpressivity
>> 
>> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVLrRVAAoJECjN6+QThfjz9aYH/Rxfz/GIFz9U+qXp2mLx1ofG
/aEt9IvHY/4PKrrzWHYW35rgTLEb1RKq5Pf9GRPvMIHTATT1W8EPxjLg8bzDj434
6Vx0d7HCpqG9Zah2VanEQkX9Q0zK1jXAkFBUwFkz/0s7boaFaf8M76/kiQi1zmQZ
oL15QtJ64/izzB5mCrM20xW/7BnKd138oWapyXRE+D7ayAC520aWTgGTOEQadZLu
Rzt4k2ru9H8Rn4x+jhl+5LaIu+vlp3txCBr08yX3jzBXKZ4lBEezo1pbNW4Z+gqX
WhjkbY+LzgRoRbvhZsF6tfCXtTT0fZn56RALNqJFcho9mtx78+BKhF6VzfH6Sy8=
=9Rg9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2015 18:57:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:41 UTC