W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > April 2015

Re: ShEx questionnaire (was Re: RDF validation questionnaire)

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:45:33 -0700
Message-ID: <552EB1CD.10002@kcoyle.net>
To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
I read Eric's mail as not being about SHACL at all, but about work being 
done elsewhere that members of this group might inform. His note was 
also posted to the DCMI list that is discussing application profiles, 
which overlaps with this W3C group but is not the same. A questionnaire 
for SHACL has not be proposed, AFAIK.

kc

On 4/15/15 11:30 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I am rather disappointed that the questionnaire is so tied to ShEx,
> particularly considering the subject of the email that went out.
>
> As far as I am concerned the only information that the working group will be
> able to take away from the questionnaire is what people think should be
> included in ShEx.  This may have very little to do with what should be
> included in SHACL.
>
> peter
>
>
>
> On 04/15/2015 10:09 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>> In some Mayo grant work, I have prepared a questionnaire on the
>> expressivity of shape expressions. It presents a high-level language for
>> expressing RDF constraints, explains a number of the technical points,
>> and asks the user for which features and technical approaches are
>> important to their work and their view of what will make the language
>> successful. There are a couple places where you can click for extra
>> geekiness, in case the baseline geekiness was insufficient.
>>
>> I'd like people to fill out the form imagining their immediate uses for
>> RDF validation as well as those that may come with new markets enabled by
>> the existence of such RDF validating tooling. The form will record your
>> results whenever you hit submit so you can easily revisit your answers
>> after reflection.
>>
>> This work is supported in part by a NIH U01 grant – caCDE-QA
>> (1U01CA180940-01A1).
>>
>> On the top of my game here... here's the link:
>> http://www.w3.org/2015/ShExpressivity
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVLq4oAAoJECjN6+QThfjzAuIH/3p+ldIXpinn5b8jLT1AJCsx
> pqje/nO3bF1YCf9klM4FSlqs6XWexomK+dbyr8DbMORm7u3ez/Z+g1xr07eWRu6U
> X1GIATSBhASgKjG2fxtc3QYURFi3qw32CyiHe0QmfM9XcoCn9BZnKlClwPOZoimk
> 7qER0R6AbH+d6aFbvLPYOlOS2w+vtPBA9lpJPjzTby2rR/V+Oz015xag59j9+JDu
> R/XGVdW9CTG0MZXMIT7ys2LKFjl5nj/F2f55+ZUn9bh5jFbyvb2Lmba2EmbzTjp5
> b0ovPTcMemAr1jVXLV+REpGkyMUWp0iFugwi4i446XaI7r6A4Xa6XsO4ucJVVP8=
> =lQNY
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2015 18:46:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:41 UTC