- From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:07:26 -0700
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, public-rdf-shapes@w3.org, public-ldp@w3.org, DC-ARCHITECTURE@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
- CC: "Jiang, Guoqian, M.D., Ph.D." <Jiang.Guoqian@mayo.edu>, "Sharma, Deepak K., M.S." <Sharma.Deepak2@mayo.edu>, "Solbrig, Harold R." <Solbrig.Harold@mayo.edu>
hello.
On 2015-04-15 11:01, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> PS: The W3C RDF Data Shapes working group has not published a FPWD about
> SHACL. The only working draft in the works is for use cases and
> requirements. The fact that there are several documents that sort of claim
> to be published working drafts appears to be an artifact of the W3C ReSpec
> system.
all i wanted to point out is that just yesterday, the FPWD was published
and it does have SHACL in its title, even though it's just UCR and not
language design. eric's questionnaire talks about ShEx, so there is some
disconnect. maybe adding one or two sentences to the questionnaire would
be good enough, but i think the way it is now, other people may end up
being slightly confused, just like myself.
cheers,
dret.
--
erik wilde | mailto:dret@berkeley.edu - tel:+1-510-2061079 |
| UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool) |
| http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret |
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2015 18:07:56 UTC