W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > April 2015

Re: RDF validation questionnaire

From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:07:26 -0700
Message-ID: <552EA8DE.702@berkeley.edu>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, public-rdf-shapes@w3.org, public-ldp@w3.org, DC-ARCHITECTURE@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
CC: "Jiang, Guoqian, M.D., Ph.D." <Jiang.Guoqian@mayo.edu>, "Sharma, Deepak K., M.S." <Sharma.Deepak2@mayo.edu>, "Solbrig, Harold R." <Solbrig.Harold@mayo.edu>

On 2015-04-15 11:01, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> PS:  The W3C RDF Data Shapes working group has not published a FPWD about
> SHACL.  The only working draft in the works is for use cases and
> requirements.  The fact that there are several documents that sort of claim
> to be published working drafts appears to be an artifact of the W3C ReSpec
> system.

all i wanted to point out is that just yesterday, the FPWD was published 
and it does have SHACL in its title, even though it's just UCR and not 
language design. eric's questionnaire talks about ShEx, so there is some 
disconnect. maybe adding one or two sentences to the questionnaire would 
be good enough, but i think the way it is now, other people may end up 
being slightly confused, just like myself.



erik wilde | mailto:dret@berkeley.edu  -  tel:+1-510-2061079 |
            | UC Berkeley  -  School of Information (ISchool) |
            | http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret |
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2015 18:07:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:41 UTC