Re: Moving forward

On 8/7/14, 3:09 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> The current draft charter is also tilted away from the kind of RDF 
> validation that is done with respect to RDFS classes, particularly in 
> the scope section.  This is particularly strange as there has been 
> quite a bit of discussion as to how class-based validation relates to 
> shapes.  I would have expected the scope to have been widened to cover 
> the goals of class-based validation of RDF graphs.

+1 very important. If we are talking about Linked Data and want to stay 
aligned with the way that ontologies are currently being built, then 
relating constraints to classes remains a requirement.

Holger