- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:41:31 +0000
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Hi Ben, I was still thinking that the call was at 4pm, so I'm afraid I have double-booked; it's school half-term here, so at 3pm we'll have just finished watching 'Up' in the cinema. One small thing, on your point 4: I agree we should start prototyping, but also I've been trying to think of a simple 'switch' that allows authors to indicate that they are making use of some prototype. Maybe it's as simple as @version with some agreed values -- perhaps we simply agree a token to represent some 'idea in progress', and the presence of that token in @version means that a parser can use this additional functionality. And on 4.b, if you get to discussing it -- my proposal before was that we should slightly modify the definition of a CURIE such that it's based not just on the syntax (i.e., "x:y") but also on the presence of a prefix mapping. In short, if there is no mapping of "x" then *by definition* "x:y" is not a CURIE. Whether it then becomes a URI is down to the containing environment -- all I'm suggesting in this first step is that we prevent the CURIE syntax from swallowing the string. It's nothing more than acting as if a function isCurie( s ) returns false for "x:y" if "x" was not defined. I don't doubt there are problems with this (I think Toby raised some, but apologies if it was someone else -- I don't have time to go back and check), but I thought I'd mention it, because I won't be on the call. Regards, Mark On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I believe Europe has changed to daylights savings, so hopefully if we keep > things at 1500 UTC, that won't be too much of a problem. > > -Ben > > > ========== > Thursday, October 29th 2009 > 1500 UTC, W3C Zakim bridge > tel:+1.617.761.6200 conference code RDFA > irc://irc.w3.org:6665/#rdfa > Duration: 60 minutes > Scribe: Zakim, pick a victim > ========== > > Agenda: > > 1) Action Items > http://www.w3.org/2009/10/22-rdfa-minutes.html#ActionSummary > > 2) RDFa WG Charter > http://rdfa.info/wiki/Rdfa-wg-charter > > brief discussion of points to add > > 3) Test Cases -- relegated to the mailing list, so we can focus on (4). > PLEASE participate in mailing list discussion of these. > > 4) RDFa 1.1 issues: where do we stand, should we start prototyping? > (brief high-level discussion of where we each lean and what our options > are.) > > a) @typeof="" > > b) URIs everywhere > > c) profile/vocab discussion > > d) DOM API > >
Received on Thursday, 29 October 2009 11:42:41 UTC