- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:46:46 -0400
- To: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Mark Birbeck wrote: > I don't disagree with you, but we have been having the 'where to do > the work' discussion for months now. Right... and we should probably stop talking about it and do something about it. I think we have a fairly clear idea regarding the direction of RDFa 1.1, HTML+RDFa 1.0 and the test suite. It has also been made clear that HTML WG has not made a firm commitment to supporting RDFa[1]. This community now has a responsibility to the companies, organizations and authors that have adopted and deployed RDFa. To ensure that we continue to correct technical issues and produce requested features, we must have a group that is committed to moving RDFa forward. I think Ivan, Ben and I should take an action to propose the RDFa WG charter to W3C management. If we fail to garner enough support, we will still move forward with RDFa (through any means necessary). In other words, I don't think the status of an RDFa WG should stop us from working on the hard technical problems. The responsibility of keeping the W3C Process satisfied should fall to the staff contact and chair, while the Task Force moves forward with the technical work that must be done. -- manu [1]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Oct/0686.html -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Establishing an Open Digital Media Commerce Standard http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2009/09/28/a-digital-content-commerce-standard/
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2009 14:47:16 UTC