2009-11-30 14:51 Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>: > > 1. we define some sort of a generic mechanism whereby an XML application > > language (and maybe even the user!) can define his/her own set of > > keywords. This should be compatible with what we have in XHTML+RDFa and > > it is then up to the SVG group to decide whether they want to use it or > > not > > In my view, having short 'tokens' for URIs is the Holy Grail...if we > can get to this point, then RDFa will essentially become an amalgam of > Microformats' ease of use, HTML's ease of deployment, and RDF's > scaleable and decentralised nature. It might be helpful to specify these keywords as a part of an XML schema. (Note: When I use the lowercase word "schema" I mean the general concept, not the particular language XML Schema.) Think of annotating an XML schema by pointing to classes/properties in an ontology. Has anything like that ever been done? Cheers, Christoph -- Christoph Lange, Jacobs Univ. Bremen, http://kwarc.info/clange, Skype duke4701
Received on Monday, 30 November 2009 23:44:30 UTC