TC158: approved with discussion TC160: approved with discussion TC162: approved with discussion TC164: approved with discussion The discussion is what Shane brought up: we're now writing test cases that will explicitly fail our new proposal. That means we need to carefully think about the "junk" triples that might be generated once we enable our new proposal, and whether these are really test cases we want. I don't mind test case duplication. A while back, we agreed on the principle that we would accept test cases only on the criteria that they're valid, otherwise combining them becomes an n^2 problem :) But if everyone else wants to merge 158 and 164, I'm also not opposed. -BenReceived on Wednesday, 18 November 2009 17:42:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:05 UTC