Shane McCarron wrote: > Just curious - how does it issue a warning? As part of the graph? > Yes. I generate an extra bnode with predicates referring to a warning type plus one with a literal for the warning text Formally this is not generated into the default graph, though, at the end, I merge all of them together before serialization Ivan > Ivan Herman wrote: >> Looks fine to me. >> >> (I was unsure on the call and I checked: my implementation already does >> that and issues a warning in case of reusing '_') >> >> Thanks >> >> ivan >> >> Shane McCarron wrote: >> >>> At the 12 November meeting, the group agreed that the RDFa Syntax >>> Specification reserves the prefix of '_', but that it could be clearer >>> about this. We agreed to put a clarification in the Errata. I propose >>> the following text: >>> >>> In sections 5.4.5 and 7 the specification indicates that the prefix '_' >>> is reserved and is used to create / reference blank nodes (bnodes). >>> Because this prefix is reserved, authors SHOULD NOT declare a mapping >>> for the prefix '_' and conforming processors MUST NOT incorporate such a >>> prefix mapping into the 'list of URI mappings' as defined in section >>> 5.5. >>> >>> >>> >> >> > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdfReceived on Saturday, 14 November 2009 18:14:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:05 UTC