Just curious - how does it issue a warning? As part of the graph? Ivan Herman wrote: > Looks fine to me. > > (I was unsure on the call and I checked: my implementation already does > that and issues a warning in case of reusing '_') > > Thanks > > ivan > > Shane McCarron wrote: > >> At the 12 November meeting, the group agreed that the RDFa Syntax >> Specification reserves the prefix of '_', but that it could be clearer >> about this. We agreed to put a clarification in the Errata. I propose >> the following text: >> >> In sections 5.4.5 and 7 the specification indicates that the prefix '_' >> is reserved and is used to create / reference blank nodes (bnodes). >> Because this prefix is reserved, authors SHOULD NOT declare a mapping >> for the prefix '_' and conforming processors MUST NOT incorporate such a >> prefix mapping into the 'list of URI mappings' as defined in section 5.5. >> >> >> > > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.comReceived on Saturday, 14 November 2009 17:38:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:05 UTC