W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > November 2009

Re: Meeting minutes, 2009-11-05

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:04:18 +0000
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: W3C RDFa task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1257707058.6339.7.camel@ophelia2.g5n.co.uk>
On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 19:42 +0100, Ivan Herman wrote:
>    ... There is MediaRSS - which is RDFa being used in a non-XHTML
>    dialect.

DataRSS, surely? DataRSS is RDFa in Atom.

Regarding an RSS 1.1 Core specification, it looks to me like there are
currently three "branches" of RDFa syntax:

1. XHTML+RDFa - the original, and a W3C Rec. DataRSS uses the same
branch of RDFa - it's essentially just got different tag names.

2. HTML+RDFa - small refinements on XHTML+RDFa necessary to get it to
work on an HTML DOM.

3. SVG 1.2 Tiny - this differs significantly from the other two in that
it may also legitimately include RDF/XML chunks.

RDF 1.1 Core needs to unite not only the first two, but also the third
branch - XML-based varieties of RDFa which can legitimately include
RDF/XML chunks. (It should specify whether triples from all of them form
a single graph or should/may be separated into separate graphs. It might
even be useful if:

	<x property="foo:bar" datatype="rdfa:reified">
 	  <rdf:RDF>...</rdf:RDF>
	</x>

resulted in something like the following N3:

	<> foo:bar { ... } .

Just some things to think about...

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Sunday, 8 November 2009 19:05:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:05 UTC