- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 10:00:23 -0500
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Philip Taylor <pjt47@cam.ac.uk>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Julian Reschke wrote: > ... > > But I think this is besides the point: what we need is a robust > processing model which works with all languages of the HTML family, > and returns predictable results; having separate sets of predefined > terms defeats this; as do different parsing rules for @rel, for that > matter. Just so I am clear - do you personally have a requirement that a document with embedded RDFa always emit the same triples, regardless of its progeny? In other words, if I have a document that is HTML5 with RDFa and parse it, and a similar document that is XHTML + RDFa and parse it, would you expect *exactly* the same triples to be emitted? Do you require this? Is it a deal breaker if the triples differ? -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2009 15:01:33 UTC