- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:24:45 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: RDFa TF list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Manu, In my opinion already resolved. We have been discussing this since 2007 and recently I tried to sum it up [1]. Cheers, Michael [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009May/0003.html -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan, Galway, Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://sw-app.org/about.html http://webofdata.wordpress.com/ > From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> > Organization: Digital Bazaar, Inc. > Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:50:51 -0400 > To: RDFa TF list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org> > Subject: Mixing @id and @about on the same element > Resent-From: RDFa TF list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:51:29 +0000 > > I had an action[1] to document the @id/@about ambiguity issue and open > it up for discussion: > > http://rdfa.info/wiki/rdfa-in-html-issues#Mixing_id_and_about_on_the_same_elem > ent > > We need to determine if creating markup like this is an acceptable practice: > > <p id="foo" about="#foo">Some text</p> > > The argument is that the document containing the markup above contains > two semantically different URLs to the same location, thus creating some > semantic ambiguity. Thoughts? > > -- manu > > [1]http://www.w3.org/2009/06/04-rdfa-minutes.html#item02 > > -- > Manu Sporny > President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Admitting That Javascript was a Mistake > http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2009/05/31/admitting-that-javascript-was-a-mista > ke/ >
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2009 14:25:24 UTC