- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:08:25 +0200
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- CC: Sergey Chernyshev <rdfa.info@antispam.sergeychernyshev.com>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Shane McCarron wrote: > > > Sergey Chernyshev wrote: >> MediaWiki team is switching to HTML 5. I planned to work on >> integrating RDFa support to Semantic MediaWiki core, but now the >> question is, how far is RDFa from haveing something working in HTML 5 >> namespace? > Technically, RDFa is defined in the HTML5 namespace, since HTML5 and > XHTML M12N share a namespace. So I think you are fine. >> >> Can you say in a couple of words what stops people from consuming RDFa >> in HTML 5? in real world that is (e.g. Yahoo, Google, smaller developers?) > In the real world there is no HTML5. There have been a couple of > working drafts published. In the real world, I would stick to HTML4 or > XHTML 1. You can safely use RDFa in these contexts. It works great! > ... That is totally misleading. There is no spec for RDFa-in-HTNL. Not even a working draft, as far as I can tell. BR, Julian (and yes, I'm a supporter of RDFa, but claiming that "there is no HTML5", and then in the same sentence saying you can do RDFa-in-HTML????)
Received on Sunday, 12 July 2009 12:09:15 UTC