- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:17:17 -0400
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa Developers <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Sam Ruby wrote: > Shane McCarron wrote: >> >> Sam Ruby wrote: >>> >>> Re: "we were told"... if you can tell me who told you that, I will >>> follow up... and resolve the issue. >> Sure. It was Ralph, Steven, Ben, and me. We all agree that the >> current task force cannot produce rec-track documents that involve >> HTML because we are not chartered to work on HTML. YOUR committee can >> certainly produce such documents. Thanks for inviting us to work with >> your group and directly edit your spec. I am sure some of us will >> take you up on that as time permits. > > OK I think we are in sync. I believe that "we were told and believed > that we could not produce such a document under the auspices of the W3C" > to be a false statement (though to see it as such requires thinking > outside of the box), and I accept that "the existing task force is under > the SemWeb and XHTML 2 Activities" was "not chartered to do so" (a.k.a. > "the box") Oops: typo. I did not intend my excerpt to include "we were told and believed that". - Sam Ruby
Received on Friday, 10 July 2009 16:17:58 UTC