- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2009 19:53:35 +0100
- To: Philip Taylor <pjt47@cam.ac.uk>
- CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Philip Taylor wrote: > Julian Reschke wrote: >> Philip Taylor wrote: >>> ... >>> XMLLiteral. But the SAX2 ContentHandler interface does not expose >>> comments to the application, so it couldn't implement this in the >>> same ... >> >> It doesn't??? > > http://www.saxproject.org/apidoc/org/xml/sax/ContentHandler.html says it > doesn't. It is only exposed by > http://www.saxproject.org/apidoc/org/xml/sax/ext/LexicalHandler.html -- > implementations that have that "optional extension" are okay (and I > assume that includes most practical implementations) but there's at > least a hypothetical concern for "core-only SAX2"-based RDFa > implementations, and it would be good to clarify the situation by adding > it to the test suite and seeing if implementors are happy with it. That's what I though: you can get comments, but it's not the default. I think what's really important is whether comments (and PIs) should trigger XMLLiterals; maybe they shouldn't? Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:54:13 UTC