- From: Philip Taylor <pjt47@cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2009 18:44:57 +0000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Julian Reschke wrote: > Philip Taylor wrote: >> ... >> XMLLiteral. But the SAX2 ContentHandler interface does not expose >> comments to the application, so it couldn't implement this in the same >> ... > > It doesn't??? http://www.saxproject.org/apidoc/org/xml/sax/ContentHandler.html says it doesn't. It is only exposed by http://www.saxproject.org/apidoc/org/xml/sax/ext/LexicalHandler.html -- implementations that have that "optional extension" are okay (and I assume that includes most practical implementations) but there's at least a hypothetical concern for "core-only SAX2"-based RDFa implementations, and it would be good to clarify the situation by adding it to the test suite and seeing if implementors are happy with it. -- Philip Taylor pjt47@cam.ac.uk
Received on Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:45:26 UTC