- From: Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:01:54 +0100
- To: "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>, "Steven Pemberton" <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Cc: "Mark Birbeck" <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>, "Toby Inkster" <tai@g5n.co.uk>, "RDFa Developers" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:43:29 +0100, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: > > > Steven Pemberton wrote: >> >> That's the current state of play if you have some SVG in the middle of >> some XHTML. SVG defines a different set of keywords to XHTML. > > Err... what? Are you suggesting that RDFa embedded in SVG *today* is > using different reserved words than those defined by the default > vocabulary? If so, that would imply that no RDFa processor I know of > would raise triples out of that correctly. It's what the SVG spec says, that's all. Steven
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 15:02:47 UTC