Shane McCarron wrote: > > > Steven Pemberton wrote: >> >> That's the current state of play if you have some SVG in the middle of >> some XHTML. SVG defines a different set of keywords to XHTML. > > Err... what? Are you suggesting that RDFa embedded in SVG *today* is > using different reserved words than those defined by the default > vocabulary? If so, that would imply that no RDFa processor I know of > would raise triples out of that correctly. > As far as I can see, SVG does _not_ define any reserved words. I honestly do not know what would be the rule if SVG was embedded in HTML, though. I am not sure we have a decision on that. Ivan -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 14:48:54 UTC