W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > December 2009

Re: Non-XHTML host languages for RDFa

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:48:09 +0100
Message-ID: <4B152CA9.1060802@w3.org>
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
CC: Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>, Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, RDFa Developers <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>

Shane McCarron wrote:
> Steven Pemberton wrote:
>> That's the current state of play if you have some SVG in the middle of
>> some XHTML. SVG defines a different set of keywords to XHTML. 
> Err... what?  Are you suggesting that RDFa embedded in SVG *today* is
> using different reserved words than those defined by the default
> vocabulary?  If so, that would imply that no RDFa processor I know of
> would raise triples out of that correctly.

As far as I can see, SVG does _not_ define any reserved words. I
honestly do not know what would be the rule if SVG was embedded in HTML,
though. I am not sure we have a decision on that.



Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 14:48:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:06 UTC