Re: URI in rel

Steven Pemberton wrote:
> I was just thinking today how unfair it is that @resource can be a URI 
> or a (safe) CURIE, but that a @rel can only be a CURIE, when it dawned 
> on me that you *can* have a URI in a rel:
> 
>     <head xmlns:http="http">
>         <link rel="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#next" 
> href="page2.html"/>
> 
> Worthy of a test methinks.

That has been proposed as a workaround before :-)

BR, Julian

Received on Monday, 20 April 2009 16:13:32 UTC