- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:12:50 +0200
- To: Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
- CC: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Steven Pemberton wrote: > I was just thinking today how unfair it is that @resource can be a URI > or a (safe) CURIE, but that a @rel can only be a CURIE, when it dawned > on me that you *can* have a URI in a rel: > > <head xmlns:http="http"> > <link rel="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#next" > href="page2.html"/> > > Worthy of a test methinks. That has been proposed as a workaround before :-) BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 20 April 2009 16:13:32 UTC