- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 07:24:06 -0500
- To: KANZAKI Masahide <mkanzaki@gmail.com>
- CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
I agree that they MUST support IRIs as input. I think the question here is what should they generate as output. I feel like the right answer is that they should generate IRIs and that it is the responsibility of the input to ensure the IRI is legal. All the RDFa spec says is that the IRI associated with the prefix is concatenated with the suffix. It doesn't say anything about transformation. KANZAKI Masahide wrote: > Hi > > 2009/3/28 Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>: > >> If there are no objections, I can create a test case to ensure that >> percent-encoding is performed before the RDFa parser generates a triple. >> > > I think RDFa parsers should accept IRI refs [1], not performing > percent encoding for multi-byte characters that are allowed in IRIs. > > cheers, > > [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3987 > > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 12:25:04 UTC