- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 10:00:22 -0500
- To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- CC: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>, RDFa TF list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Michael Hausenblas wrote: > In that sense I find it irritating that the RDFa Syntax [2] in the 'Status' > section talks about: > > 'A sample test harness is available. This set of tests is not intended to be > exhaustive. Users may find the tests to be useful examples of RDFa usage. An > implementation report lists several implementations of this specification > tested during the Candidate Recommendation period. A community-maintained > Wiki page includes subsequent updates.' > > Referencing Manu's Test Harness rather than (correctly) the RDFa TC/Manifest > - any chance we get that fixed? > Not easily - it is quite hard to update a spec at the W3C - for obvious reasons. We are planning an update in the coming months though - maybe you want to propose some text? > Cheers, > Michael > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/ > > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2009 15:01:10 UTC