- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:47:10 -0500
- To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- CC: "public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf.w3.org" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
I honestly think this is one of those "how many angels on the head of a pin" discussions. To the great unwashed out there the distinction will be lost. And introducing a new URI scheme seems a heavy weight solution for such an esoteric problem. I sort of like your bnode abstraction because it allows the creation of a decent node that I can reference throughout a document. It is way better than the fragment identifier approach I was going to take. I think I will try going that way and see where it takes me. Thanks! Steven Pemberton wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 22:53:30 +0200, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> > wrote: > >> One question that has already been posed to me for which I do not >> have a good answer: >> >> In the examples I point to the dbpedia entry for the Washington >> Monument as the definitive *subject* I am describing. There is also >> a Washington Monument web page from the US Government. Why is that >> not a more appropriate subject? I use a link to it in the examples >> so there is something to "click" on. And if that were the subject >> for everything, is there a way to update the markup so that we >> wouldn't have to duplicate the URI? > > As Mark pointed out, this is a question I recently raised. In short, > there is a major difference between a thing and a web page about that > thing. > > The dc:creator of me is my mother*, but the dc:creator of my web page > is me. If you mixed me up with my web page, you would have to conclude > that I was my own mother. It's as simple as that. > > I went to a talk at XTech by someone creating a search engine for RDF, > and he said it was a major headache for them, since their engine was > constantly concluding things like "Tim Berners-Lee" and "W3C" were the > same thing. > > So the approach I am using in the tutorial I am writing is to say: > > <link about="_:WashingtonMonument" rel="foaf:primaryTopicOf" > > href="http://www.dbpedia.org/resource/Washington_Monument" /> > ... > <p about="_:WashingtonMonument" > property="geo:lat_long" > content="38.8895563,-77.0352546">During our trip ... > > and then it doesn't matter if you use the Wikipedia page as referent, > or the .gov page, or even both. > > My recent proposal to shortcut this is to define a new URI scheme: > > <p about="pto:http://www.dbpedia.org/resource/Washington_Monument" > property="geo:lat_long" > content="38.8895563,-77.0352546">During our trip ... > > (where 'pto' means 'primary topic of'). > > Steven > * In passing, I recently met the daughter of an Italian artist who'd > had her mother's signature tatooed on her neck. > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Monday, 30 June 2008 15:47:49 UTC