- From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:29:07 -0700
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- CC: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, public-swd-wg@w3.org, olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
Karl Dubost wrote: > > What do you mean by "this language can be served as text/html"? > Is it RDFa? > Is it XHTML (containing RDFa)? XHTML+RDFa. > I'm checking the [RDFa Implementation Report][1]. That document is not yet complete, as we have just entered CR. > It is not clear how the document has been sent (as html or as xml) > for testing the RDFa processor. It is not clear either if the > document is on the Web (with mime-type) or out of the Web (without > mime-type) during the processing. This is a bit complicated, as some processors make the request for the URL and go from there, whereas other RDFa processors work straight on the DOM inside a browser, thereby assuming that the browser did the right thing with MIME types. In any case, I'm not sure this has any effect on the validator's behavior, right? -Ben
Received on Monday, 23 June 2008 05:29:49 UTC