W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > June 2008

Re: RDFa is a Candidate Recommendation

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:14:14 +0900
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, public-swd-wg@w3.org, olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
Message-Id: <37129097-0C0E-46FB-AACF-4200CBB6DF88@w3.org>
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>

Hi Shane,

Le 21 juin 2008 à 22:30, Shane McCarron a écrit :
> I have been really bad about this in the past - and this is no  
> exception.  Sorry!  There is a new XHTML Family language: XHTML+RDFa  
> [1].  The latest version of the DTD will always be at http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-rdfa-1.dtd 
>  [2].  Is there a way to get this into the validator?  Also, note  
> that as per the (currently being updated) XHTMLMIME document [3],  
> this language can be served as text/html or applicaiton/xhtml+xml.

What do you mean by "this language can be served as text/html"?
Is it RDFa?
Is it XHTML (containing RDFa)?

I'm checking the [RDFa Implementation Report][1]. It is not clear how  
the document has been sent (as html or as xml) for testing the RDFa  
processor. It is not clear either if the document is on the Web (with  
mime-type) or out of the Web (without mime-type) during the processing.


[1]: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/implementation-report/

Karl Dubost - W3C
Be Strict To Be Cool
Received on Monday, 23 June 2008 05:14:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:57 UTC