- From: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:20:29 -0400
- To: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: "SWD WG" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
I diffed the June 9th [1] and April 22nd [2] versions of the RDFa Primer and am happy with the changes. The Primer is a very readable and useful document--I've even heard this from other people at $work. Congratulations on advancing RDFa another step forward. //Ed [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/20080609/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/20080422/ On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> wrote: > > > Members of the SWD and XHTML2 WGs, > > (First, regrets for tomorrow's telecon, I will be at Yahoo giving a tutorial > on... RDFa, what else?) > > We would like to ask both working groups to submit the RDFa in XHTML 1.1 > specification for advancement to Candidate Recommendation. Given that the > timing works well, we would also like to ask members of the WGs to approve > the latest RDFa Primer for publication. > > -Ben > chair, RDFa Task Force > > ===================================== > > RDFa in XHTML 1.1 Syntax > http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/CR-rdfa-syntax-20080612 > > Diff from February Last Call Draft: > http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/CR-rdfa-syntax-20080612/rdfa-syntax-diff.html > > Test Cases > http://rdfa.digitalbazaar.com/rdfa-test-harness/ > (undergoing last tweaks because of SPARQL engines inconsistencies) > > Implementation Report: > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/implementation-report/ > (will be updated as we evaluate all implementations during CR) > > Disposition of Comments: currently working on this document from XML dump > from the tracker. > > All closed issues can be found at > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/closed > starting with the text "Last Call Comment:" > > Two open issues are at > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/products/2 > (they have been addressed in our telecons, we're just waiting for a response > from folks who brought up the two issues.) > > > None of the issues have resulted in formal objections. > > > RDFa Primer: > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/20080609/ > > RDFa Primer previous draft (the one on which comments were received): > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/primer/20080422/ > > Comments on the Primer: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Apr/0157.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008May/0106.html > > Response to Comments: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008May/0176.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008May/0172.html > >
Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2008 12:21:09 UTC