- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 22:52:07 -0400
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Ivan Herman wrote: > My question is different. I am not sure test #109 and and #108 are > fundamentally different (except for one more level). In other words, if > an implementation passes #108, it will pass #109, too, wouldn't it? If > so, then #109 might be superfluous... Yeah, it might be superfluous, but I wanted to make sure that since we had the "strange" case of TC #107 not generating a triple, and TC#108 generating one triple that TC#109 was there just to ensure that only 2 triples are created (not three). Although, now that you mention it... the SPARQL should probably be modified to ensure that only 2 are generated, not 3. I'll try to create some SPARQL that does that for TCs 108 and 109. While TC 109 isn't a very strong test case, I don't think it hurts anything to put it in there (to be thorough). -- manu -- Manu Sporny President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: DB Launches Medical Record Sales Service with Shepherd Medical http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2008/02/24/health2trade/
Received on Monday, 9 June 2008 02:53:07 UTC