Re: RDFa Primer comment

On 16 Jul 2008, at 06:55, Shane McCarron wrote:

> While I agree that it is physically possible... there is no  
> profile, it is not valid, it requires the use of XML Namespaces,  
> etc.  It is not something that the HTML community would ever have  
> agreed to.  You parsers might swallow it, but that doesn't mean it  
> is something we should encourage.  This is a W3C effort, and the  
> W3C has not defined that behavior.


I agree with all of that ... and clearly 'hygiene' text is  
appropriate, but whether we have to globally substitute HTML with  
XHTML is another question.

Jeremy

Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2008 14:06:48 UTC