Mark Birbeck wrote: > Hi Ivan, > >> ... but isn't it true that you would get a >> >> <#ben> foaf:knows [] . >> >> triple instead? The existence of @rel means that (in the second <a>) the >> [new subject] will be set to the BNode sent down from <div> >> (representing the hanging @rel) which will then complete it... > > That _was_ true. : > > But the other day you pointed out exactly this flaw in my processing > rules, and I said that I was going to fix it. So if we assume that > incomplete triples are only completed by a bnode if there is something > to say about that bnode, then in this example, no triples would be > generated at all. > Ah. I presume you refer to the 'return value' thingy. I was not thinking in terms of your model:-) but I just looked at my implementation, made a (mental!) extension to your rules:-) and yes, indeed it takes care of that, too! Comment on this withdrawn:-) Ivan > Regards, > > Mark > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2008 16:19:36 UTC