- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 08:34:24 -0600
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
We definitely do not permit xml:base in xhtml+rdfa because xml:base does
not work in XHTML 1.1.
Ivan Herman wrote:
> My understanding was that, at some point, we decided _not_ to allow
> xml:base in RDFa! Unfortunately, I do not have a reference to the
> relevant mail:-(. Or am I wrong?
>
> (As a full disclosure: although it would require editing my code, I
> would be in favour of having it... But there were some good reasons back
> then not to allow it, though I do not remember what they were...)
>
>
> Ivan
>
> Manu Sporny wrote:
>
>> Purpose:
>>
>> Tests to ensure that relative URLs are resolved correctly when used in
>> @about when using xml:base.
>>
>> ====================== Test Case 73 =============================
>>
>> ---------------------Test Case 73 XHTML--------------------------
>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML+RDFa 1.0//EN"
>> "http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-rdfa-1.dtd">
>> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
>> xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
>> <head>
>> <title>Test 0073</title>
>> </head>
>> <body xml:base="http://www.example.org/#">
>> <p about="faq">
>> Learn more by reading the example.org
>> <span property="dc:title">Example FAQ</span>.
>> </p>
>> </body>
>> </html>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> ---------------------Test Case 73 SPARQL -----------------------
>> ASK WHERE {
>> <http://www.example.org/#faq>
>> <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title>
>> "Example FAQ" .
>> }
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> -- manu
>>
>>
>
>
--
Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2008 14:34:45 UTC