- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:04:45 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <477CC14D.3000901@w3.org>
My understanding was that, at some point, we decided _not_ to allow
xml:base in RDFa! Unfortunately, I do not have a reference to the
relevant mail:-(. Or am I wrong?
(As a full disclosure: although it would require editing my code, I
would be in favour of having it... But there were some good reasons back
then not to allow it, though I do not remember what they were...)
Ivan
Manu Sporny wrote:
> Purpose:
>
> Tests to ensure that relative URLs are resolved correctly when used in
> @about when using xml:base.
>
> ====================== Test Case 73 =============================
>
> ---------------------Test Case 73 XHTML--------------------------
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML+RDFa 1.0//EN"
> "http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-rdfa-1.dtd">
> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
> xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
> <head>
> <title>Test 0073</title>
> </head>
> <body xml:base="http://www.example.org/#">
> <p about="faq">
> Learn more by reading the example.org
> <span property="dc:title">Example FAQ</span>.
> </p>
> </body>
> </html>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ---------------------Test Case 73 SPARQL -----------------------
> ASK WHERE {
> <http://www.example.org/#faq>
> <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title>
> "Example FAQ" .
> }
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -- manu
>
--
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2008 11:04:51 UTC