- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:04:45 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <477CC14D.3000901@w3.org>
My understanding was that, at some point, we decided _not_ to allow xml:base in RDFa! Unfortunately, I do not have a reference to the relevant mail:-(. Or am I wrong? (As a full disclosure: although it would require editing my code, I would be in favour of having it... But there were some good reasons back then not to allow it, though I do not remember what they were...) Ivan Manu Sporny wrote: > Purpose: > > Tests to ensure that relative URLs are resolved correctly when used in > @about when using xml:base. > > ====================== Test Case 73 ============================= > > ---------------------Test Case 73 XHTML-------------------------- > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML+RDFa 1.0//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-rdfa-1.dtd"> > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" > xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"> > <head> > <title>Test 0073</title> > </head> > <body xml:base="http://www.example.org/#"> > <p about="faq"> > Learn more by reading the example.org > <span property="dc:title">Example FAQ</span>. > </p> > </body> > </html> > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > ---------------------Test Case 73 SPARQL ----------------------- > ASK WHERE { > <http://www.example.org/#faq> > <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title> > "Example FAQ" . > } > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- manu > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2008 11:04:51 UTC