Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221

Johannes Koch schrieb:
> I have some comments on 
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-rdfa-syntax-20080221>:

Yet another comment:

5.4.4. Use of CURIEs in Specific Attributes

"Note that only values in the link type list have this special 
behaviour, which means that any value that is not in the list and is not 
a valid CURIE MUST not generate triples in the [default graph] ."

Even "foobar" is a valid CURIE according to section 7, because it "is 
also possible to omit both the prefix and the colon, leaving just a 
reference."

However "the mapping to use when there is no prefix is not defined;"

If your intent is to disallow unprefixed CURIEs you may want to change 
the text above to

"Note that only values in the link type list have this special 
behaviour, which means that any value that is not in the list and is not 
a valid and prefixed CURIE MUST not generate triples in the [default 
graph]."
-- 
Johannes Koch
In te domine speravi; non confundar in aeternum.
                             (Te Deum, 4th cent.)

Received on Friday, 29 February 2008 13:29:13 UTC